After reviewing available information on WiFi, Mobile phones, Electromagnetic Frequencies (EMF) and all other forms of radiation, I feel there is much cause for concern on this issue and below is urgent information from various experts for your review.
According to Dr. Robert Becker — in his book Cross Currents, he helps you gain a better understanding about Mobile Phone Towers and Mobile Phone Radiation and how the body is a living antenna, sending and receiving information. He also found that when you expose a bacterial culture to abnormal electromagnetic fields, the bacteria believe they are being attacked by your immune system and start producing much more virulent toxins as a protective mechanism.
Since reviewing this information it is now easier to understand how the heavy metals in our body can amplify symptoms and why some people may be highly sensitive to Electromagnetic Fields. We are more susceptible to receive harmful radiation from Mobile Phone Towers and Mobile Phone Radiation due to our level of toxicity in heavy metals.
If heavy metals can weaken our field through their frequency outputs by modulating compatible frequency components of the body resulting in a weakening of the field thereby causing unhealthy biochemical changes, and you have accumulated toxic metals in your brain, since your brain is an antenna, you can actually receive more Mobile Phone Radiation, which in turn can cause the microbes in your system to overreact and create more potent mycotoxins. This means that it can create a never-ending vicious cycle between the microbes and metals in your body and your exposure to electromagnetic fields, which can lead to hypersensitivity.
Dr. Yoshiaki Omura’s research shows that the more your system is contaminated with heavy metals, the more your body becomes a virtual antenna that actually concentrates radiation, making it far more destructive.
In Dr Dale’s opinion – author of the book Transform Your Emotional DNA and according to various long-term research, minerals can protect the body; perhaps fortify one’s field. Nano Ionic Minerals penetrate the cell and are safe and effective.
Mobile phone warning issued in 2000
Dr Devra Davis, an award-winning, internationally renowned scientist who also was the founding director of the Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the U.S. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences found out that a fellow named William Stewart, who had been Margaret Thatcher’s chief science advisor, had issued a warning for the Royal College of Physicians, advising that teenagers not use cell phones. He did this in the year 2000. Dr. Davis realized that if there was indeed a danger, it was imperative that action be taken now… not decades later: She also explains;
“If we wait for proof of harm – and that proof is brain cancer… What we know about brain cancer is this: it can take 40 years to develop. We know that from when the bombs fell toward the end of World War II – there was no increase in brain cancer at all until 40 years after. And we know that there is an increase in brain cancer from ionizing radiation associated with that bomb.
If brain cancers have 40-year latency in a population, and we wait for evidence as we did with tobacco and asbestos and population increases of cancer, we will be in huge trouble.
More importantly, we have evidence that cellphone radiation interferes with sperm production, sperm quality, and sperm vitality. We know that there are millions – in fact, billions – of young people growing up, keeping phones in their front pockets. The fine print warning that comes with the Android says, ‘Keep it 2.54 centimeters from the pregnant abdomen or the abdomen of a teenager.’ …Nobody reads it. The iPhone 4S has fine print warnings also to not to put it in your pocket.”
She also goes on to explain……
Why the SAR Value is NOT a Good Measure of a Phone’s Safety
The SAR (“Specific Absorption Rate”) value is a measure of the maximum tested power of the cell phone and its potential for heating tissues. The SAR rating itself is nothing new. In fact, the SAR values of phones have been available for some time, typically listed in fine print somewhere in your owner’s manual, on the manufacturer’s website, and in the FCC’s databases.
But the SAR level only measures the power density of a phone, estimating the radiation penetration into the head using a plexiglass head of a simulated 200-pound man. This is just an estimate, and it is only an estimate of one of the components of risk from cell phones. It does not gauge the risk from the frequencies of the cell phone, the erratic pulsing and modulation of the signals, or the magnetic fields from batteries.
The actual SAR exposure can also be greatly impacted by the manner in which you hold the phone, whether you use a headset, how strong the signal is going into and out of the phone, and your physical location in relation to nearby cell towers. In fact, the weaker the signal – the fewer bars it shows – the harder the phone has to work to reach the tower, so the more radiation will be released into your brain or body. The SAR has a very limited use, and only as a comparative measure between phones on this one risk variable, and is not in any way a measure of cell phone safety.
Dr. Davis explains:
“The assumption has been that the only effect of microwave radiation on the brain is to cause a change in temperature. Now as you know, the brain actually can’t perceive heat at all. That’s why you can do awake brain surgery. The brain does not perceive pain or heat. So, you can operate on people when they are awake, once you drill onto their skull by anesthetizing the skull, that can feel the pain. The brain itself doesn’t feel pain or heat. You can have a device on the outside and… by the time you feel heat in your ear, your brain is much hotter.
The cellphones have only been tested for heat. They have never been tested for the biological impact of microwave radiation aside from heat.
Studies that I talk about in my book ‘Disconnect,’ and that we show on our website, EnvironmentalHealthTurst.org, clearly indicate that pulse digital signals from cellphone radiation can alter membranes, weaken membranes, increase reactive oxygen species, which produce free radicals (which, as you know, are very damaging and go around wherever they find us, lose electron, knock it off, and can cause havoc within cells). Cellphone radiation, it does those things.
We don’t understand the long-term biological effects, but I’m really concerned that the major damage from cellphone radiation is to our reproductive organs. People keeping phones in their pockets – the fine print warnings say don’t do that.”
World Health Organisation Rules Mobile Phones and Other Wireless Radiation a Possible Carcinogen
Last year, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), an arm of the World Health Organization (WHO), reviewed relevant studies and declared that cell phones are possible cancer-causing agents, in the same category as diesel engine exhaust, some pesticides, and some heavy metals. The expert panel ruled that there was some evidence that regular cell phone use increased the risk of two types of tumors – brain tumors (gliomas) and acoustic neuromas.
Dr. Davis notes that the phrase used to describe cell phone radiation-radiofrequency energy – is misleading. Cell phones do not produce energy, she notes. They do emit radiation at about the same frequency as a microwave oven. While cell phone microwave radiation is much weaker than an oven, cell phone radiation is pulsed and digital. Its erratic signal may well account for its biological impact.
“In fact, a cellphone is a two-way microwave radio,” Dr. Davis points out. “Industry has fought successfully to use the phrase ‘radiofrequency energy’ instead of microwave radiation. Because they know radiofrequency energy sounds fine. We listen to music with radios. Everybody needs more energy. What could be better than that?
But radiofrequency energy is another word for microwave radiation. If people understood that they were holding a two-way microwave-radiating device next to their brain or next to their reproductive organs, they might think differently about it.”
Cell Phone Radiation Weakens Cell Membranes
Dr. Davis also explained the work of Allan Frey from the Office of Naval Research, who did some pioneering research in the 1960s that is very applicable to cell phone use today.
Dr. Davis continues:
“Cellphone radiation weakens membranes everywhere. It weakens the blood-brain barrier. I discussed in my book ‘Disconnect’ the pioneering research of Allan Frey… [who] did research with pulse digital signals from microwaves. What he was able to do was show that that signal allowed blue dye (that was yellow) that he injected into the animals to get into the brains. Animals that were not exposed to this pulse digital signal, their brain stayed naturally pink (the normal colour of the brain). The animals that were exposed to cellphone-like radiation, their brains were dyed fluorescent yellow. Then he concluded that this radiation was clearly weakening the blood-brain barrier.
Now, the interesting thing is that when he did this study, there were no cellphones. He was just studying weak pulse digital signals. Because at that point the issue was what is the effect of radar and what might be the effects of microwaves later on. This is an issue of some controversy.
…This means you’re holding a cellphone next to your brain, you’re weakening the blood-brain barrier, and any toxic material that’s in your blood (because you live in the modern world) is going to be more deeply absorbed into your brain and into the cells of your body, just because you have cellphone radiation next to you.”
Children Shouldn’t Use Mobile Phones
Due to their unique vulnerabilities children are thought to be at increased risk to damage from mobile phone radiation, and should not use them atall (or only for very limited amounts). The brain is actually protected in part by the skull, because bone is more dense than brain, which contains fluid. The brain of a child, the head of a child is particularly vulnerable because their skulls are thinner and their brains contain more fluid. It’s the fluid in fat which can absorb more microwave radiation.
Current research provides evidence. For example, Dr. Lennart Hardell and his research team at Orebro University in Sweden showed that children who start using a mobile phone as teenagers develop 4 to 8 times more brain cancers than those who began to use phones later in life. Experimental studies showing significant neurological changes from exposure to microwave radiation levels that meet our FCC guidelines. Environmental exposures at critical periods can have profound effects on fetal and childhood development.
Practicing safe phone use is very simple. It means distance is your friend. Keep the phone off your body. Use an air tube headset if you can find one, or any headset will do, so long as it’s not dripping down the front of your body and conducting it right back into you. Protect their reproductive organs Never keep a phone on in your pocket, close to your abdomen or on your body. If you DO give a child or a toddler a cell phone to play with, be sure it is at least set to “Airplane Mode” so that the wireless connections are disabled. Dr. Davis is hopeful that safer technology is underway.
Useful Website reference
Important Articles to Review
The article The Largest Biological Experiment Ever By Arthur Firstenberg can be read here.
France National Library gives up WiFi you can read the article here.
Disconnect (the truth about cell phones) by Devra Davies
Electromagnetic Fields by Levitt B Blake
Cross Currents by Dr Robert Becker
Zapped by Anne Louise Gittleman
Tranform your emotional DNA – Dr Becker or Dr Dale